Urban AI as a contested formation: Unpacking the power dynamics and discursive struggles shaping smart city governance
Original framing: “Urban AI should not be understood as a single, inevitable next stage of the smart city, say researchers” — Phys.org
Cross-cultural perspectives on urban planning and governance highlight the importance of considering diverse cultural values and practices. By engaging with these perspectives, we can develop more nuanced and inclusive approaches to urban development.
The contested formation of urban AI highlights the need for more nuanced and inclusive approaches to urban development.
By centering Indigenous perspectives, engaging with cross-cultural values and practices, and prioritizing community benefits over corporate interests, we can develop more sustainable and equitable approaches to urban AI development. The solution pathways outlined above offer a starting point for developing more inclusive and sustainable urban AI development strategies, but ultimately, the key to success lies in engaging with diverse perspectives and prioritizing community-led development initiatives.