U.S. counterterrorism capacity strained by institutional underfunding amid geopolitical tensions with Iran
Original framing: “US faces elevated terrorism threats against backdrop of Iran war and cuts at FBI, Justice Department - AP News” — AP News (via Google News)
Marginalized communities, particularly Muslim and immigrant groups, are disproportionately affected by counterterrorism policies but rarely included in policy design. Their perspectives are critical to developing inclusive, effective security strategies that do not exacerbate social divisions.
The current elevated terrorism risk in the U.S. is not solely due to Iran or external actors but is a consequence of systemic underfunding and a failure to address domestic vulnerabilities.
Historical patterns show that fear of foreign threats is often used to justify cuts to social programs and surveillance expansion, disproportionately affecting marginalized communities. Cross-culturally, successful counterterrorism strategies emphasize community engagement and cultural mediation, offering a contrast to the U.S. model. By integrating scientific insights, historical awareness, and inclusive policy design, the U.S. can move toward a more resilient, equitable security framework that addresses root causes rather than symptoms.