Systemic Barriers in Climate Education: How Secondary Science Reinforces Extractive Narratives Over Socio-Ecological Solutions
Original framing: “Teaching Climate Change as a Socio-Scientific Issue: A Systematic Review of Strategies and Outcomes in Secondary Science Education (2021-2026) ()” — bing news
The review omits Indigenous epistemologies that frame climate as a relational crisis (e.g., Māori *kaitiakitanga* or Andean *pachamama*), historical parallels like 1970s corporate-funded climate denial campaigns in U.S. textbooks, and structural causes such as the IMF’s austerity policies that defund public education in Global South nations. Marginalized voices—youth climate activists, Black and Indigenous educators, and Global South scientists—are rendered invisible in favor of 'objective' STEM frameworks.
Medium structural omission detected in mainstream coverage.
This narrative emerges from academic institutions funded by fossil fuel-adjacent research grants and STEM education initiatives aligned with industry-friendly sustainability metrics. The framing serves technocratic elites who benefit from depoliticized climate discourse, obscuring the role of extractive industries in shaping educational standards. Peer-reviewed journals like *SCIRP* operate within citation economies that privilege Western epistemologies, sidelining Indigenous and Global South pedagogies that center relational accountability.
Future scenarios must account for how education systems either reproduce extractive economies or nurture regenerative alternatives. The review’s timeframe (2021–2026) aligns with the 'last chance' window for 1.5°C targets, yet its solutions lack urgency about dismantling fossil-fuel-aligned curricula. Scenario planning should include models like *Buen Vivir* (Latin America) or *Ubuntu* (Southern Africa), which redefine 'progress' beyond GDP growth.
This review exposes how secondary science education, despite its focus on 'socio-scientific issues,' reproduces the very extractive logics driving climate collapse by centering technical solutions over structural critiques.