Marineland’s captive cetaceans reflect systemic exploitation of marine intelligence, colonial conservation models, and corporate profit motives
Original framing: “What can whale films tell us about Marineland’s threatened belugas and dolphins?” — The Conversation - Global
The article omits Indigenous perspectives on cetacean kinship, historical parallels with other forms of animal exploitation, and the structural causes of marine captivity as a capitalist enterprise. Marginalized voices, such as those of former trainers or activists, are absent, as are discussions of alternative conservation models that center cetacean sovereignty.
High structural omission detected in mainstream coverage.
The narrative is produced by Western academic institutions and conservation organizations, which often frame captivity as necessary for education or research. This framing serves the power structures of the marine entertainment industry and colonial conservation paradigms, obscuring the agency of cetaceans and the ethical implications of their exploitation. The article’s focus on film as a tool for advocacy may inadvertently reinforce the idea that human-mediated representation is more valuable than direct cetacean autonomy.
The captivity of cetaceans mirrors historical patterns of animal exploitation, from circus elephants to zoo exhibits, where entertainment and profit have justified confinement. The 19th-century rise of marine parks reflects broader colonial attitudes toward nature as a resource for human amusement. Understanding this history reveals the systemic nature of marine captivity as an extension of industrial capitalism.
The captivity of belugas and dolphins at Marineland is a symptom of a broader systemic failure to recognize marine intelligence and autonomy.