Middle East Diplomacy: Unpacking the Systemic Drivers of Regional Conflict and Cooperation
Original framing: “Russian, UAE foreign ministers seek resumption of talks to achieve Middle East agreement - Reuters” — Reuters (via Google News)
This framing omits the historical experiences and perspectives of indigenous peoples in the region, such as the Palestinian and Bedouin communities. It also neglects the structural causes of conflict, including the impact of colonialism, imperialism, and neoliberal economic policies. Furthermore, the narrative fails to incorporate the knowledge and insights of marginalized communities, such as women, youth, and minority groups.
Low structural omission detected in mainstream coverage.
This narrative is produced by Reuters, a Western-based news agency, for a global audience. The framing serves to highlight the diplomatic efforts of great powers, while obscuring the agency and perspectives of regional actors and marginalized communities. The narrative reinforces a dominant Western-centric view of international relations, neglecting the complex histories and power dynamics of the Middle East.
The Middle East conflict has its roots in the colonial and imperialist histories of the region, including the Ottoman Empire, British and French colonialism, and the subsequent creation of modern nation-states. Understanding these historical patterns and parallels is crucial for developing effective conflict resolution strategies.
The Middle East conflict is a complex and multifaceted issue, shaped by a combination of historical, structural, and cultural factors.