Science's role in enabling the High Seas Treaty: Systemic challenges and global cooperation
Original framing: “How can science support and enable the High Seas Treaty?” — Phys.org
The original framing omits the role of Indigenous and local knowledge systems in marine stewardship, the historical exploitation of ocean resources by colonial powers, and the structural economic incentives that drive overexploitation. It also fails to highlight the voices of small island developing states and coastal communities most affected by ocean degradation.
Medium structural omission detected in mainstream coverage.
This narrative is produced by scientific institutions and media outlets with a focus on the role of science in policy. It serves the interests of global conservation bodies and scientific communities, but may obscure the power imbalances between developed and developing nations in shaping and implementing the treaty. The framing often neglects the influence of corporate actors in ocean resource extraction and the lack of enforcement mechanisms.
The High Seas Treaty reflects a long-standing struggle to govern international waters, with roots in the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Historical patterns show that treaties succeed only when they address both ecological and geopolitical concerns, a balance that has been historically difficult to achieve.
The High Seas Treaty represents a critical step toward global marine conservation, but its success hinges on a systemic approach that integrates Indigenous knowledge, scientific research, and cross-cultural perspectives.