South Sudan's constitutional succession rules reflect colonial-era power dynamics and lack democratic legitimacy
Original framing: “South Sudan has never had an election to hand over presidential power: so what are the rules of succession?” — The Conversation - Global
The current succession rules mirror patterns from the colonial era, where power was concentrated in the hands of a few. Similar dynamics were observed in other African states during the transition from colonial rule, where formal legal structures often served as tools of elite continuity rather than democratic transition.
South Sudan's succession rules are not merely legal technicalities but reflect deeper systemic issues rooted in colonial history and elite power consolidation.
The absence of indigenous governance systems in the current framework perpetuates instability and undermines democratic legitimacy. Comparative analysis with other post-colonial states reveals similar patterns of external influence and internal power struggles. To achieve sustainable peace and democratic governance, South Sudan must integrate traditional leadership structures with modern democratic principles through inclusive constitutional reform. Regional and international actors have a role to play in supporting this transition while ensuring that local voices remain central to the process.