← Back to stories

NASA's Artemis II Mission Highlights Systemic Reliance on Commercial Software in Space Exploration

The Artemis II mission's Microsoft Outlook issue highlights the increasing reliance on commercial software in space exploration, underscoring the need for more robust and adaptable technical solutions. This reliance can compromise mission success and expose vulnerabilities in critical systems. Moreover, the incident underscores the importance of integrating diverse perspectives and expertise in mission planning and execution.

⚡ Power-Knowledge Audit

The narrative produced by The Verge serves the interests of the tech industry by framing the issue as a minor glitch, rather than a symptom of a broader systemic problem. This framing obscures the power dynamics at play, where commercial software companies exert significant influence over mission planning and execution. The narrative also neglects the expertise and perspectives of NASA's mission control team and the astronauts themselves.

📐 Analysis Dimensions

Eight knowledge lenses applied to this story by the Cogniosynthetic Corrective Engine.

🔍 What's Missing

The original framing omits the historical context of NASA's reliance on commercial software, which dates back to the 1960s. It also neglects the expertise of indigenous communities and traditional knowledge holders who have developed sophisticated navigation and communication systems. Furthermore, the narrative fails to consider the long-term implications of this reliance on commercial software, including the potential for mission failure and the erosion of NASA's autonomy.

An ACST audit of what the original framing omits. Eligible for cross-reference under the ACST vocabulary.

🛠️ Solution Pathways

  1. 01

    Developing Indigenous-Inspired Navigation Systems

    NASA can develop indigenous-inspired navigation systems that are adapted to the complex systems at play in space exploration. This could involve integrating indigenous navigation and communication systems into mission planning and execution. By doing so, NASA can develop a more nuanced understanding of the complex systems at play and develop more effective and efficient solutions.

  2. 02

    Integrating Scientific Evidence and Methodology

    NASA can integrate scientific evidence and methodology into mission planning and execution to develop more robust and adaptable technical solutions. This requires a more nuanced understanding of the complex systems at play, including the interactions between software, hardware, and human factors. By doing so, NASA can develop more effective and efficient solutions.

  3. 03

    Engaging with Marginalised Voices and Perspectives

    NASA can engage with marginalised voices and perspectives in mission planning and execution to develop more robust and adaptable technical solutions. This includes indigenous communities, traditional knowledge holders, and other groups who have been historically excluded from decision-making processes. By doing so, NASA can develop more effective and efficient solutions.

🧬 Integrated Synthesis

The Artemis II mission's Microsoft Outlook issue highlights the systemic reliance on commercial software in space exploration, underscoring the need for more robust and adaptable technical solutions. This requires a more nuanced understanding of the complex systems at play, including the interactions between software, hardware, and human factors. By integrating indigenous knowledge, scientific evidence, and marginalised voices and perspectives, NASA can develop more effective and efficient solutions that are better suited to the complex systems at play in space exploration. This requires a more holistic approach to mission planning and execution, one that integrates artistic, spiritual, and scientific perspectives.

🔗