Europe’s Cold War 2.0: How post-Soviet espionage norms and NATO’s intelligence blind spots fuel geopolitical instability
Original framing: “Austria expels Russian diplomats suspected of espionage” — Financial Times
Indigenous perspectives on espionage often center on **collective sovereignty and the violation of communal trust**, concepts absent in Western statecraft. For example, the **Dene and Inuit peoples of Canada** have historically resisted foreign intelligence operations on their lands, framing espionage as a form of **cultural colonization**. While not directly applicable here, this lens highlights how **land-based knowledge systems**—where secrecy is tied to survival—contrast with the **transactional secrecy** of state espionage. The Austrian case could be reframed through the question: *How might Indigenous governance models, which prioritize transparency in resource-sharing agreements, reshape intelligence cooperation to reduce espionage risks?*