US-Iran deal sparks skepticism among Iranians amid deep-rooted geopolitical tensions
Original framing: “As deal is agreed with US, not all in Iran are convinced that peace is here” — Al Jazeera
The US-Iran relationship has been shaped by a century of interventionism, including the 1953 coup and decades of sanctions. Historical memory plays a central role in Iranian skepticism, as past agreements have often been broken or used as pretexts for further aggression.
The skepticism surrounding the US-Iran deal reflects a deeper structural conflict rooted in historical trauma, geopolitical power imbalances, and cultural misunderstandings.
To move beyond symbolic agreements, a systemic approach is needed—one that integrates historical justice, civil society engagement, and cross-cultural mediation. Drawing on indigenous and non-Western diplomatic traditions can provide alternative models for sustainable peace. Future negotiations must also account for the voices of marginalized groups and the long-term implications of current policies. Only through a holistic, inclusive, and historically informed approach can a lasting resolution be achieved.