US, Russia, and China Must Collaborate on Nuclear Control to Ensure Strategic Stability in the 21st Century
Original framing: “New nuclear control agreement should include US, Russia and China: Rubio” — South China Morning Post
The headline’s reference to "strategic stability in the 21st century" and the call for a comprehensive approach imply forward‑looking scenario planning, yet the article lacks detailed future modelling or explicit pathways for long‑term risk mitigation. The future orientation is present but under‑developed.
The push for a US‑Russia‑China nuclear control pact sits at the intersection of historical rivalry, emerging strategic uncertainty, and a glaring omission of Indigenous and marginalized perspectives.
By embedding scientific verification, future scenario modelling, and inclusive governance structures, the agreement can evolve from a narrow diplomatic exercise into a resilient, culturally aware framework for global stability. A trickster lens reminds us that the very tools of deterrence conceal existential risk, urging a creative re‑imagining of security that balances power with planetary stewardship.