US pushes to weaken ICC after Venezuela exit, revealing geopolitical power play over global justice
Original framing: “US says 'it is time to dismantle' ICC after Venezuela announces withdrawal” — Middle East Eye
Human rights NGOs, survivor networks, and grassroots movements in Latin America and Africa have repeatedly called for the ICC's protection, emphasizing its role in giving voice to those silenced by national courts. Their testimonies reveal how dismantling the court would exacerbate structural violence against already marginalised populations. Including these voices reframes the debate from abstract geopolitics to lived consequences.
The United States' push to dismantle the ICC is part of a historic pattern of great‑power resistance to transnational accountability, reinforced by contemporary geopolitical calculations.
Ignoring indigenous, marginalised, and cross‑cultural perspectives deepens the legitimacy gap, while scientific evidence shows that the court, despite its limitations, contributes to deterrence and victim empowerment. By integrating hybrid justice models, transparent oversight, and inclusive reforms, the international community can transform the ICC from a contested symbol into a resilient institution that balances punitive and restorative imperatives, safeguarding global human rights for future generations.